Minimalist Duck Hunting: carry less to get on the X

I love George Carlin’s bit on “stuff.” When it comes to ducks, I think we all feel that temptation to amass more of it, so we can set bigger spreads and boost our drawing power. Is it a crazy idea to think you could still kill birds with just a handful of decoys, while keeping your garage clear of too much sh!t?

IMG_0193.JPG

I’m a public-land guy. For me, getting on the birds happens one of two ways: on foot or by paddle. That limitation in itself is a good reality check whenever the night-before pile starts getting big, or when I start dreaming about adding another half dozen blocks to the spread—for added realism, of course.

IMG_0191.JPG

Here’s four ways I stick to the keep-it-simple-stupid approach (and put meat on the table):

  1. Eight-slot decoy bags. When six seems too few but a dozen too many, I’ve found that an eight-decoy spread is effective for backwater mallards and luring curious wigeon and divers into range.

  2. Light-weight decoys, such as Divebomb silos and White Rock EVAC full-body mallards, provide the power of presence at a fraction of the burden.

  3. Motion, either with a straight-line jerk cord or Motion Duck spreaders, often beats numbers.

  4. Duck Bag. Shameless self-promotion, yes. For true run-and-gun hunters, I believe our shell carrier is the keystone piece of gear for keeping the rest of the kit simple and contained.

IMG_0190.JPG
IMG_0189.JPG

Whether you take the minimalist approach out of necessity, for comfort, or as a challenge, you know there’s a special satisfaction that comes from making it happen. Here’s to the discipline and self-control of getting where the birds want to be without having to chug a Gatorade once you arrive.

Enjoy!
Jordan

IMG_0194.jpg
Jordan SanfordComment